Governmental meddling breeds a new breed of physician that
could set the medical profession back 6000 years.
Despite the fact that we still have the finest medical schools
in the world, corrupt and stupid government will insure that
our health care is completely controlled by nothing but a
collection of idiots who couldn't care less whether you live or die.
Medscape Urology
From
Infections in Urology®
Editorial
The New Millennium: A New Breed of Physician
Stacy J. Childs, MD, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center,
Denver, Colo.
_________________________________________________________________
Along with the new millennium comes a new breed of physician -- a
clinician unwilling to settle for longer hours of work for less income
and diminished respect from patients as a result of less patient
contact. [Infect Urol 11(6):164, 1998. © 1998 SCP Communications,
Inc.]
____________________________________________________
I was recently sitting in an airport awaiting a return flight home. My
companion, an esteemed academic urologist, began talking about the new
breed of urology residents in his program. The urologists of the new
millennium are not expecting the big bucks that cardiologists,
orthopedists, cardiac surgeons, and radiologists accrued in the 1980s.
They are also not looking forward to solo practice; rather, they hope
to work for a large multispecialty group or managed care organization.
Nor do they expect to work 60 to 70 hours per week, but hope instead
to spend 40 to 50 hours at their job to find a better-quality
lifestyle and family relationship than the previous generation had. I
would say that is admirable.
Fifty years ago, a physician's gratification from practicing medicine
came mostly from pleasing his or her patients, then from respect in
the community, and last from modest financial reward. Time spent
talking with each patient about his or her job, family, hobbies, and
so on was important. Surely, healing incorporated a significant
placebo effect of time spent listening to the patient that can be seen
after visits to a chiropractor or naturalist.
How has managed care changed this picture? Physicians who insist on
preserving income levels approximating those of the pre-managed care
era are forced to see high numbers of patients and spend longer hours
at their trade -- translating into fewer minutes with more patients --
thus drastically decreasing patient satisfaction and lessening the
chance of a placebo effect. So, while the financial reward diminishes,
the respect from dissatisfied patients also will be proportional.
Physician self-disappointment will then follow. The threat of lawsuits
encourages overutilization, but managed care teaches underutilization;
physicians are caught in the middle. The new millennium urologist will
rebel, will not tolerate irate patients and managed care
organizations, and subsequently will be deselected from the HMO.
Eventually, managed care organizations will run out of docs to fire --
we will all retire at age 55.
A recent article in AMA News indicated that the salary for a top CEO
of a managed care organization topped $30 million per year. The head
of this executive's professional organization said that the
compensation "fell woefully short" of what comparable CEOs in other
businesses commanded. As a urologist, I examine male patients every
day who complain that they are "woefully short," when they actually
measure average or even better than average. And, as they say down
South, "It is not how deep the well nor how long the rope, but how you
dangle the bucket that is important anyway." CEOs of HMOs better
dangle a little better if doctors are going to stay in this system.
Think for a moment about the compensation awarded to teachers, who
shape the minds of future generations; of clergy, who help direct the
morals of society; of those charged with taking care of the elderly
when no one else wants to do it; of housewives who teach values and
ethics to our kids. Now think again of multimillion dollar health
insurance CEOs and what they do for you, me, our patients, and
society. Talk about getting sick!
_________________________________________________________________
Dr. Childs is Associate Clinical Professor of Urology at the
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver, Colo., and
has a private practice in Cheyenne, Wyo. He is Editor-in-Chief of
Infections in Urology.
Medscape
[INLINE]
Home Search Site Map Talk to Us Help
INTERACT
[INLINE] Email this article to a colleague.
[INLINE]
RECOMMENDED LINKS
STACEY J. CHILDS, MD EDITORIAL
[INLINE]
Column Index
_________________________________________________________________
RELATED SPECIALTIES
[INLINE]
Urology
_________________________________________________________________
Straightforward information for impotence
Site Tools Map [INLINE]
For: _____________________________________ [in Full-Text.........]
______ help
Advanced Searching: Full-Text | MEDLINE | TOXLINE | AIDSLINE | Bookstore | Dic
tionary | Drugs
Site Navigation Map Produced by Medscape, Inc. All material on this
server Copyright © 1994-1998 by the publishers involved.
Top of Page
Uncivilization and its Discontents
Home Page
Medscape Urology
From
Infections in Urology®
Editorial
The New Millennium: A New Breed of Physician
Stacy J. Childs, MD, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center,
Denver, Colo.
_________________________________________________________________
Along with the new millennium comes a new breed of physician -- a
clinician unwilling to settle for longer hours of work for less income
and diminished respect from patients as a result of less patient
contact. [Infect Urol 11(6):164, 1998. © 1998 SCP Communications,
Inc.]
____________________________________________________
I was recently sitting in an airport awaiting a return flight home. My
companion, an esteemed academic urologist, began talking about the new
breed of urology residents in his program. The urologists of the new
millennium are not expecting the big bucks that cardiologists,
orthopedists, cardiac surgeons, and radiologists accrued in the 1980s.
They are also not looking forward to solo practice; rather, they hope
to work for a large multispecialty group or managed care organization.
Nor do they expect to work 60 to 70 hours per week, but hope instead
to spend 40 to 50 hours at their job to find a better-quality
lifestyle and family relationship than the previous generation had. I
would say that is admirable.
Fifty years ago, a physician's gratification from practicing medicine
came mostly from pleasing his or her patients, then from respect in
the community, and last from modest financial reward. Time spent
talking with each patient about his or her job, family, hobbies, and
so on was important. Surely, healing incorporated a significant
placebo effect of time spent listening to the patient that can be seen
after visits to a chiropractor or naturalist.
How has managed care changed this picture? Physicians who insist on
preserving income levels approximating those of the pre-managed care
era are forced to see high numbers of patients and spend longer hours
at their trade -- translating into fewer minutes with more patients --
thus drastically decreasing patient satisfaction and lessening the
chance of a placebo effect. So, while the financial reward diminishes,
the respect from dissatisfied patients also will be proportional.
Physician self-disappointment will then follow. The threat of lawsuits
encourages overutilization, but managed care teaches underutilization;
physicians are caught in the middle. The new millennium urologist will
rebel, will not tolerate irate patients and managed care
organizations, and subsequently will be deselected from the HMO.
Eventually, managed care organizations will run out of docs to fire --
we will all retire at age 55.
A recent article in AMA News indicated that the salary for a top CEO
of a managed care organization topped $30 million per year. The head
of this executive's professional organization said that the
compensation "fell woefully short" of what comparable CEOs in other
businesses commanded. As a urologist, I examine male patients every
day who complain that they are "woefully short," when they actually
measure average or even better than average. And, as they say down
South, "It is not how deep the well nor how long the rope, but how you
dangle the bucket that is important anyway." CEOs of HMOs better
dangle a little better if doctors are going to stay in this system.
Think for a moment about the compensation awarded to teachers, who
shape the minds of future generations; of clergy, who help direct the
morals of society; of those charged with taking care of the elderly
when no one else wants to do it; of housewives who teach values and
ethics to our kids. Now think again of multimillion dollar health
insurance CEOs and what they do for you, me, our patients, and
society. Talk about getting sick!
_________________________________________________________________
Dr. Childs is Associate Clinical Professor of Urology at the
University of Colorado Health Sciences Center in Denver, Colo., and
has a private practice in Cheyenne, Wyo. He is Editor-in-Chief of
Infections in Urology.
Medscape
Email me, Bill Hammel at
bhammel@graham.main.nc.us
READ WARNING BEFORE SENDING E-MAIL
I reserve the right to ignore nonsense.
The URL for this document is:
http://graham.main.nc.us/~bhammel/MED/newmed.html
Created: December 14, 1998
Last Updated: May 28, 2000